Showing posts with label energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label energy. Show all posts

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Ads From a Simpler LIFE

"It’s only 31 miles from New York City and
is a very pleasant drive."
This gracious invitation from Con Edison to come and view the Indian Point nuclear facility, was one of two ads for nuke plants that ran in the June 16, 1967 issue of Life.

Westinghouse, who built the reactor for Connecticut Yankee, the plant at Haddam Neck, also advertised in that issue. CY was shut permanently in 1996 and has since been decommissioned.
"The plant will be a welcome neighbor—as clean and quiet
as any good neighbor could be."


"… made with Monsanto ingredients that just refuse
to go wrong—no matter who stirs them up."
A Monsanto ad in the same issue.


"We may be the only phone company in town, but we
try not to act like it."
This AT&T ad encouraged home shopping and reassured us as to just how benevolent a monopoly it was.


“Born loser” is a term we don’t hear much these days. Sure, we have high unemployment, but we’ve got high self-esteem to match. We’re all winners these days, as our kids’ shelves of meaningless trophies, prove. The only losers we tolerate now are weight losers.


One of four cigarette ads in the issue.


Remember Polaroid? This simple ad really looked great running inside the front cover.

Monday, May 3, 2010

Exxon's Layered Bars of Meaning


The cover of ExxonMobil's recent annual report, folds out to reveal a lavish chart illustrated with photos of various types of energy. It shows the history of energy demand in the U.S. by source back to 1850 and projected out to 2030.

Interesting that they chose to show demand with bars all the same height, plotting percentage and not actual amounts. This is completely kosher and correct and this is exactly how to display the data for the story Exxon wants to tell: By 2030, the mix of our energy use in the U.S. will have shifted to cleaner sources. I am posting this because I thought it was an excellent example of “message management” with infographics. Exxon clearly wants to show that oil consumption is decreasing, and that they are being smart and responsible for investing heavily in natural gas (which is cleaner than oil). Keep in mind, however that the segments show demand ONLY AS A PERCENT OF TOTAL.

A few pages into the report, after CEO, Rex Tillerson’s letter to shareholders, we learn that worldwide energy demand between 2005 and 2030, will have increased by 35%. Over that same period, even with all the legislation, technology, and international agreements, energy-related CO2 emissions will still have increased 25%. So as you can see in their much more modestly produced chart, below, when actual amounts are plotted, the picture is not nearly as pretty.

I think that their choice to depict oil in green was carefully calculated as well.
Related Posts with Thumbnails